Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Clause & Effect

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
March 28, 2007

Music-Publishing Agreements/ Copyright Renewal Terms. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided that singer/songwriter Roger Miller gave his music publisher the renewal rights to his 1958-1963 songs. Roger Miller Music Inc. v. Sony/ATV Publishing LLC, 05-6824. Miller, who died in 1992, had signed agreements with Sony's predecessor-in-interest Tree Publishing which required Miller and Tree to execute a separate exhibit for each song that Miller delivered to the publisher. The appeals court noted: 'Because the publishing agreements made no reference to the renewal copyrights and the Exhibit A agreements were never executed, Appellants [Roger Miller Music and widow Mary Arnold Miller] contend that Sony could not have received the renewal copyrights for Miller's 1958-1963 songs.' But the exhibit agreement stated Miller authorized the publisher to 'renew' his copyrights, which the appeals court found demonstrated 'the intent to convey the renewal interest; this is particularly true because even more generic terms, such as 'forever' and 'hereafter,' have sufficed to convey an interest in the renewal copyrights.' And though a subsequent 1969 contract in which Miller and Tree agreed to waive the Exhibit A signing requirement 'specifically mentions only the royalty provisions of the Exhibit A agreement,' the court concluded that 'nothing in the parties' course of dealing shows that the parties did not intend to be bound by all the provisions of the Exhibit A agreement.'

Sony had conceded to the district court that Miller's estate owned his 1964 songs because the songwriter had died before the renewal term began on Jan. 1, 1993. But the appeals court ruled: 'Sony's statements dealt with legal conclusions, and not matters of fact, and therefore the district court erred in concluding that the statements were [binding] judicial admissions ' [W]e remand the case to the district court so it can determine whether it should hear Sony's new argument regarding its ownership of the renewal copyrights in the 1964 songs.'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.