Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

How to Pitch a Story

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
March 30, 2007

You're an attorney in a mid- to large-sized firm with several regional offices. Your practice is going well, but you feel the need for some 'face time' ' a little walk down the Insider Catwalk. What do you do?One way is to write an article, and since this is the Law Journal Newsletters Web site, we'll offer some handy tips for our own publications, but they really apply to any publication in the industry. Let's suppose, just as an example, that you have recently and successfully tried a case involving an employee blog that led to a lawsuit against his company. You represented the company'and won. Voila! You crunch your notes, get some input from peers in your firm, turn the notes into an article without too much trouble, and there you go. Face time.Next question: Where do you publish? You surf the Web for likely publications, and lo and behold, you wind up on www.ljnonline.com. And you see The Corporate Counselor, Business Crimes Bulletin, and e-Discovery Law & Strategy, among many others. They sound good, but the first one sounds ideal. What do you do next?

  • Before pitching an article, always make sure you know the newsletter. Download at least three issues. Have they run articles on the same topic? Are the articles much longer or shorter than the one you have written? Who is the audience? (That's an easy one; we write for lawyers and others in the legal community who need analysis of issues important to their practice).
  • Make sure your article is 'fresh news.' For instance, although it may be very helpful to explain Sarbanes-Oxley to the uninitiated, our readers are well aware of SOX and all its ramifications.
  • Make sure you are writing more than a case summary. Our readers want to know why a certain ruling is of importance to them and their practice. They NEED TO KNOW, which is the whole point. Anybody can find a case ruling; the key is ANALYSIS.
  • Once you are sure your article meets our needs, you are ready to make your pitch. The best way is via e-mail: [email protected], or by phone, 215-557-2309. You want to be listened to, so here is the 'right way': 'My name is Joe Lawyer. I'm a partner/associate/etc. with ABC LLP, in the Denver office. I've noticed that The Corporate Counselor has run quite a few articles on company liability for employee blogs, but I think I have a new angle your readers need to hear about. I've written a 2000-word article that explains a case I just won, and the ramifications for your readers. I'd love to share it, is there a chance?' That is DEFINITELY going to get your article read and considered.
  • Wrong way: 'My name is Joe Lawyer. Did you know that employee blogging can lead to lawsuits against a company?' [Um, yeah ' ] 'Read all about it in a fantastic new article I've written describing the landmark Jones v. Brown case and its ramifications [discussed at length in the newsletter's recent three-part series that Joe Lawyer didn't bother to read].' This e-mail won't make it past 'delete.'

You're an attorney in a mid- to large-sized firm with several regional offices. Your practice is going well, but you feel the need for some 'face time' ' a little walk down the Insider Catwalk. What do you do?One way is to write an article, and since this is the Law Journal Newsletters Web site, we'll offer some handy tips for our own publications, but they really apply to any publication in the industry. Let's suppose, just as an example, that you have recently and successfully tried a case involving an employee blog that led to a lawsuit against his company. You represented the company'and won. Voila! You crunch your notes, get some input from peers in your firm, turn the notes into an article without too much trouble, and there you go. Face time.Next question: Where do you publish? You surf the Web for likely publications, and lo and behold, you wind up on www.ljnonline.com. And you see The Corporate Counselor, Business Crimes Bulletin, and e-Discovery Law & Strategy, among many others. They sound good, but the first one sounds ideal. What do you do next?

  • Before pitching an article, always make sure you know the newsletter. Download at least three issues. Have they run articles on the same topic? Are the articles much longer or shorter than the one you have written? Who is the audience? (That's an easy one; we write for lawyers and others in the legal community who need analysis of issues important to their practice).
  • Make sure your article is 'fresh news.' For instance, although it may be very helpful to explain Sarbanes-Oxley to the uninitiated, our readers are well aware of SOX and all its ramifications.
  • Make sure you are writing more than a case summary. Our readers want to know why a certain ruling is of importance to them and their practice. They NEED TO KNOW, which is the whole point. Anybody can find a case ruling; the key is ANALYSIS.
  • Once you are sure your article meets our needs, you are ready to make your pitch. The best way is via e-mail: [email protected], or by phone, 215-557-2309. You want to be listened to, so here is the 'right way': 'My name is Joe Lawyer. I'm a partner/associate/etc. with ABC LLP, in the Denver office. I've noticed that The Corporate Counselor has run quite a few articles on company liability for employee blogs, but I think I have a new angle your readers need to hear about. I've written a 2000-word article that explains a case I just won, and the ramifications for your readers. I'd love to share it, is there a chance?' That is DEFINITELY going to get your article read and considered.
  • Wrong way: 'My name is Joe Lawyer. Did you know that employee blogging can lead to lawsuits against a company?' [Um, yeah ' ] 'Read all about it in a fantastic new article I've written describing the landmark Jones v. Brown case and its ramifications [discussed at length in the newsletter's recent three-part series that Joe Lawyer didn't bother to read].' This e-mail won't make it past 'delete.'
Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.