Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A 'Statement' As an Act of Insurance Fraud
In State v. Fleischman, 189 N.J. 539, 917 A.2d 722 (N.J. 2007), the New Jersey Supreme Court interpreted what constitutes a 'statement' made as an act of insurance fraud. The court considered whether the defendant, Randi Fleischman, made the requisite number of 'statements' or acts to make out a prima facie case of second-degree insurance fraud under N.J.S.A. 2C:21-4.6. The matter was before the court after the Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal of the second-degree insurance fraud count of an indictment against Fleischman. Several other counts of the indictment were upheld at the motion level.
Under N.J.S.A. 2C:21-4.6(a), a person commits 'insurance fraud' when he or she 'knowingly makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, fraudulent, or misleading statement of material fact ” as part of an insurance claim. The crime, a third-degree offense, becomes a crime of the second degree when five or more acts are committed in furtherance of a claim for more than $1000.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.