Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided that a Florida federal district court, rather than a Mexican court, should hear a suit by one Spanish-language broadcaster against another for tortious interference with a soap-opera actor's contract. (Mexican law doesn't recognize a tortious-interference claim.) Grupo Televisa S.A. v. Telemundo Communications Group Inc., 05-16659. Mexican-based Grupo Televisa filed suit in Florida federal court after Hialeah, FL-based Telemundo signed an agreement with actor Juan Mauricio Islas Ilescas ('Islas'), whom Grupo Televisa had under exclusive contract. Grupo Televisa's agreement with the actor stated that any disputes were to be decided under Mexican law.
The appeals court explained: 'While the facts do indicate that the defendants held one meeting with Islas' agent in Mexico, they held four such meetings with Islas and/or his representatives in Miami ' [including] the meeting where Islas and the defendants entered into an exclusivity agreement; thereby, breaching Islas' pre-existing exclusivity agreement with the plaintiffs ' Thus, the Florida contacts are both numerically and qualitatively more significant when it comes to determining the 'principal location of the defendant's conduct.” The appeals court added that
 'the terms of the underlying [Grupo Televisa/Islas] contract and the parties' expectations should have little bearing on the law that governs third party interference in that contract.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
  On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
  The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
  When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
  This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.