States have recently, and with growing enthusiasm, embraced the use of public-private partnerships ('PPPs') as a highly effective method for addressing the significant capital needs associated with developing, expanding, and/or operating major roadway systems. Some of the largest roadway PPP deals to date have utilized leasing structures, and many states have enacted, or are in the process of enacting, legislation authorizing and encouraging leasing as a method to privatize toll roads. Leasing allows for an innovative teaming approach to the development and operation of various transportation-related assets, from design and construction through operation and toll collection. Leasing not only allows public sector officials to take advantage of private sector innovation and efficiencies, but it also provides a vehicle by which states can create large pools of money ' sometimes in the billions of dollars ' to address immediate and significant capital requirements without raising property or income taxes on their residents.
Sven C. HodgesPart One of a Two-Part Series
States have recently, and with growing enthusiasm, embraced the use of public-private partnerships ('PPPs') as a highly effective method for addressing the significant capital needs associated with developing, expanding, and/or operating major roadway systems.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Letter Agreement Between Landlord and Tenant Did Not Extinguish GuarantyTreble Damage Award Upheld; Landlord Failed to Establish Overcharge Was Not WillfulDenying Access to Landlord Constituted Breach Entitling Landlord to PossessionTenant Entitled to Yellowstone Injunction With Respect to Taxes and Sewer Charges
New York is one of the first states to adopt laws to regulate artificial intelligence use in advertising and to strengthen post-mortem publicity rights regarding AI-generated replicas and “synthetic performers.” Given the state’s role as a bellwether for consumer-protection and advertising regulation, these new laws, combined with the state’s broader AI legislative framework, represent a shift toward transparency, consent and accountability.
State app store age verification regimes do more than reallocate responsibility between platforms and developers. They create a new data supply chain for age knowledge, one that can move COPPA questions from “do we ask age?” to “what do we do when the platform tells us?” The teams that handle this best will treat platform age signals as sensitive compliance inputs: minimize them, tightly control where they flow, and design product behavior so that minors do not trigger unnecessary collection or disclosure.
The firms leading right now chose to ask what would become possible if they managed the entire revenue lifecycle — from invoice generation to cash receipt — in one place, and what AI could actually accomplish with complete data instead of partial feeds. That is the Power of One.
A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), United States v. Heppner, has generated outsized commentary suggesting that the use of generative AI tools may jeopardize attorney-client privilege. A closer reading shows something far less dramatic.
