Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The assessment of replacement compensation generally includes a review of industry statistics and other pertinent factors, including the experience and judgment of the valuation expert. Before a level of replacement compensation can be determined, the valuator must consider numerous factors including, but not limited to, the types of duties that the owner performs in his/her position with the business, the owner's education and level of experience, and the number of hours the owner works in comparison to non-owner employees who perform similar duties and have a comparable educational and experience background as the owner. In addition, the size of the company, the complexity of its organizational structure and the geographical region of the country may impact the decision-making process relative to the level of replacement compensation to utilize.
In order for replacement compensation to have a true economic basis, it must be reasonable for the circumstances at hand. One of the most developed areas of the law involving replacement compensation issues evolved from tax court decisions that were argued for purposes of assessing the ordinary and necessary nature of the expense for executives and/or related parties. In addition, the tax courts have ruled, and have provided guidance, within the context of valuation for estate and gift tax purposes. As a result of the numerous tax court decisions that have been handed down on this subject area, it can be helpful to look to those court decisions for guidance in matrimonial cases.
Mad Auto Wrecking Inc. v. Commissioner
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.