Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The New Franchise Rule deletes the four exclusions in the existing Rule for employer-employees and general partnerships, cooperative organizations, testing or certification services, and single trademark licenses, since a revised definition of 'franchise' in the Rule obviates the need for these exclusions. The New Rule retains the exemption for franchise sales under $500, fractional franchises, and leased departments, while adding an exemption for petroleum marketers governed by the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, as well as for three categories of 'sophisticated investor.'
The 'sophisticated investor' exemptions eliminate disclosure obligations to persons who can, it is assumed, take care of themselves without government assistance. The first exemption applies to a franchise where a large investment is required. Exempt are transactions in which the prospective franchisee makes an initial investment of at least $1 million, excluding the cost of unimproved land and funds provided by the franchisor or its affiliates. The total initial investment in a multi-unit franchise is used in determining the required amount. The franchisee must sign
an acknowledgment certifying the investment will exceed $1 million and that the franchisee is aware of the Rule and knows that making an investment in that amount and signing the acknowledgment exempts the transaction from the Rule. If a franchisee-entity has more than one investor, the exemption will apply only if at least one individual invests more than $1 million in the project. A group of investors contributing less than $1 million each does not satisfy the exemption's requirements. If a conversion franchise is involved, the initial investment in the unit or units being converted can satisfy the $1 million threshold. For a franchise transfer, the amount of the sale is used to determine the investment for purposes of the exemption.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.