Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Franchisors and franchisees alike are awaiting a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court that could change the marketing and promotional practices of franchisors and distributors. In PSKS, Inc. d/b/a Kay's Kloset v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., the Supreme Court heard challenges to the application of the per se rule to vertical minimum price fixing agreements under antitrust law, and some commentators believe that the Court will overturn this requirement, which was adopted almost a century ago in Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911).
In 1995, Leegin, a manufacturer of Brighton women's accessories, began selling its product to PSKS, a women's clothing and accessories specialty store. Shortly thereafter, Leegin instituted the 'Brighton Retail Pricing and Promotion Policy,' stating it would do business only with retailers that follow its suggested retail prices for Brighton products. Leegin made clear that it would not do business with retailers who engaged in discounting Brighton products. Leegin later introduced the 'Heart Store Program,' a marketing initiative designed to provide incentives to Brighton retailers to promote the brand within a separate section of their stores. To become a Brighton Heart Store, retailers had to pledge to 'follow the Brighton Suggested Retail Pricing Policy at all times.'
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.