Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Pepper Hamilton LLP announced that it has expanded its New York office with the addition of Kenneth J. King and Samuel J. Abate, Jr. as partners in the Health Effects Litigation Practice Group. King and Abate are experienced in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation, as well as commercial litigation.
Phillips Lytle LLP, a full service law firm with statewide coverage in New York, has named Craig A. Leslie as special counsel at the firm's Buffalo office effective immediately. Leslie concentrates his practice in the areas of product liability, tort litigation, commercial litigation, and real property valuation dispute and tax assessment challenges. He has substantial trial and appellate experience in both state and federal courts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.