Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A cross-coastal ruling in the little-known predecessor of the epic suit filed in March by Viacom International, Inc. against YouTube, Inc. and its new parent, Google, Inc., elucidates key issues arising under the Digital Milleneum Copyright Act ('DMCA') that the a New York federal district judge will likely focus on in the much anticipated and ballyhooed litigation.
In Robert Tur d/b/a Los Angeles News Service v. YouTube, Inc., CV 06-4436 FMC (C.D., Cal.; June 20, 2007), California federal District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper denied defendant YouTube's partial summary judgment motion seeking dismissal of plaintiff's complaint under Section 512(C) of the DCMA, a safe harbor provision. Judge Cooper found that a more thorough investigation was required to determine how much control YouTube exerted over the Web site in assessing whether the famous site qualifies as a 'service provider' to trigger the statute's safe harbor provision.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.