Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesTopicsLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Clause & Effect

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |

Satellite Television/Programming-Exclusivity Agreements. The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado decided that a satellite channel breached its agreement to exclusively provide its programming to the DISH Network satellite broadcast service. EchoStar Satellite LLC v. Persian Broadcasting Co. Inc. (PBC), 05-cv-00466-PSF-MEH. EchoStar and PBC had executed an affiliation agreement under which PBC agreed to provide its Farsi-language programming to DISH Network in the United States. An exclusivity provision in the affiliation agreement stated: 'Notwithstanding the foregoing grant of exclusive rights, [PBC] shall not be in breach of the exclusivity provision contained in this Agreement, if [PBC] distributes the Tapesh 1 channel to subscribers to its current service offered on the Telstar 5 satellite ('Current Service') (provided that such subscribers shall be limited to those subscribers that are in existence as of the Effective Date) ' until [Sept. 30, 2004] and during such time, [PBC] shall use its best efforts to migrate the [PBC] Customers to the DISH Network distribution platform ' For clarity, the parties agree and acknowledge that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, in no event will [PBC] broadcast the Tapesh 1 channel on the Current Service after [Sept. 30, 2004].'

EchoStar filed suit alleging that PBC had materially breached the affiliation agreement in part by continuing to distribute its programming on GlobeCast North America's Telstar 5 satellite after the exclusivity-provision deadline had passed. PBC argued that the exclusivity provision was 'ambiguous, at best, as to whether the broadcasting prohibition extends only to distribution to 'subscribers' or to all distribution on GlobeCast beyond the Sept. 30, 2004 deadline.' Because GlobeCast had no 'subscribers' who paid monthly fees for service, PBC claimed that its agreement with EchoStar allowed PBC to continue to have its programming distributed on Telstar 5.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.