Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
James T. O'Reilly, former associate general counsel with Procter & Gamble Co., has joined Baker & Daniels LLP as counsel. As a member of the firm's life sciences practice group, he will focus on FDA, biotech, EPA, OSHA, and other regulatory issues. The depth of O'Reilly's nationwide and international expertise will assist clients with inspections, compliance, product approval, and liability risk issues.
At Procter & Gamble from 1974-98, O'Reilly was the company's principal regulatory counsel, working closely with internal clients and industry coalitions on EPA, FDA, regulatory agency, and Congressional matters. Since 1980, he also has been on the faculty at the University of Cincinnati College of Law, teaching food and drug law, administrative law, product liability, criminal law, labor law, public sector law, and systems of regulation courses.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.