Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

The Law At Odds: Looking for Harmony Between 337 and the '271(g) Exception

By Christopher Demas, Michael Garvey and Richard Sharpe
August 30, 2007

Development Corp. owns a patent covering a process for making a chemical 'X.' Imports Inc. uses the process to make chemical X in Europe. Chemical X is then materially altered as it is converted to chemical 'Z'; then it is shipped to the United States. Can Development Corp. block importation of chemical Z? The answer might depend on what forum Development Corp. chooses.

According to U.S. patent law, the answer should be 'yes.' 35 U.S.C. '271(g) specifically allows importation of a product made by a patented process in a foreign country as long as the product is materially changed prior to entry in the United States. However, in Kinik Co. v. ITC, 362 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2004), the Federal Circuit upheld an International Trade Commission ('ITC') ruling that the defenses established in '271(g) are not available in so-called 337 actions brought before the ITC under 19 U.S.C. '1337. Thus, even though it is permissible under U.S. patent law to import a product made employing a U.S. patented process somewhere upstream, the possibility remains that the ITC could enjoin the importation of that product anyway pursuant to its own finding of infringement under the administrative laws.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.