Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As readers are well-aware, Sarbanes-Oxley, the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ have established standards for director independence. These are not the only director independence standards that can affect a corporation and its board. Director independence is also significant under Delaware law. Although similar, the standards for director independence under Sarbanes-Oxley ('SOX'), stock exchange rules and Delaware law differ. A director who is independent under SOX may not be independent under stock exchange rules or Delaware law and vice versa.
So why does it matter if a director is independent under SOX and/or stock exchange rules, but not Delaware law? If stockholders sue directors of a Delaware corporation (the majority of Fortune 500 companies and companies on the NYSE are incorporated in Delaware) for breach of fiduciary duties, it is likely that a court will apply Delaware law. A finding that a majority of directors is not independent under Delaware law can have serious consequences, including increased litigation expenses, in fiduciary duty litigation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.