Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Effective July 3, 2007, a new ' 250 was added to the Domestic Relations Law. (Some of us will recall that DRL ' 250 was the statutory designation for the Full Financial Disclosure provision which was repealed on July 19, 1980, the effective date of DRL 236(B), popularly known as the Equitable Distribution Law, which incorporated and expanded its provisions as DRL ' 236(B)(4).) The new section reads:
The statute of limitations for commencing an action or proceeding or for claiming a defense that arises from an agreement made pursuant to subdivision three of Part B of section two hundred thirty-six of this article entered into (a) prior to a marriage or (b) during the marriage, but prior to the service of process in a matrimonial action or proceeding, shall be three years.
1. The statute of limitations shall be tolled until (a) process has been served in such matrimonial action or proceeding, or (b) the death of one of the parties.
2. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a separation agreement or an agreement made during the pendency of a matrimonial action or in settlement thereof.
3. This enactment clarifies the statute of limitations issue that has bedeviled our courts for a score of years.
Initial Conflict in Departments
When DRL 236(B) was enacted, effective July 19, 1980, subparagraph 3) authorized, for the first time, agreements 'made before or during the marriage' which could include '1) a contract to make a testamentary provision of any kind, or a waiver of any right to elect against the provisions of a will; 2) provision for the ownership, division or distribution of separate and marital property; 3) provision for the amount and duration of maintenance or other terms and conditions of the marriage relationship, subject to the provisions of ' 5-311 of the general obligations law, and provided that such terms were fair and reasonable at the time of the making of the agreement and are not unconscionable at the time of entry of final judgment ' ' as well as provisions for custody, support of children of the marriage pursuant to DRL ' 240.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.