Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Complying with the FCPA in Emerging Markets After SOX

By Michael E. Clark
September 27, 2007

One of the current top priorities of the Department of Justice ('DOJ') and SEC is enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA or the 'Act'). The FCPA was enacted in 1977 after over 400 publicly traded U.S. corporations admitted to the SEC that, collectively, they had made over $300 million in illegal or questionable payments to foreign government officials, politicians, and political parties. The Act was amended in 1998, and its reach was further expanded to correspond with the 'OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Trans- actions' adopted by 30 OECD members and five additional countries. After the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley ('SOX') in 2002, disclosures of FCPA violations increased dramatically. 'In 2004, the SEC and DOJ brought the largest number of FCPA enforcement actions ever and have imposed record level fines accompanied by an unprecedented variety of additional criminal and civil sanctions.' Aaron G. Murphy, The Migratory Patterns of Business in the Global Village, 2 N.Y.U. J. L. & Bus. 229, 256 (2005).

The recent settlement of parallel FCPA actions in the Southern District of Texas against Baker Hughes, Inc., a major oilfield service company, and its wholly owned subsidiary Baker Hughes Services International Inc. (collectively 'Baker Hughes'), underscores the importance of complying with the FCPA's provisions in emerging markets. Over $4 million in bribes was paid to a consulting firm that was Baker Hughes' agent for a major oil field services contract. Baker Hughes knew that its agent would transfer funds to an official with the state-owned oil company of Kazakhstan, a country with enormous oil reserves. To resolve the actions, Baker Hughes paid $44 million in combined fines and penalties ' the largest sanction ever imposed in an FCPA case.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.