Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Complying with the FCPA in Emerging Markets After SOX
One of the current top priorities of the Department of Justice ('DOJ') and SEC is enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA or the 'Act'). The FCPA was enacted in 1977 after over 400 publicly traded U.S. corporations admitted to the SEC that, collectively, they had made over $300 million in illegal or questionable payments to foreign government officials, politicians, and political parties. The Act was amended in 1998, and its reach was further expanded to correspond with the 'OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Trans- actions' adopted by 30 OECD members and five additional countries. After the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley ('SOX') in 2002, disclosures of FCPA violations increased dramatically. 'In 2004, the SEC and DOJ brought the largest number of FCPA enforcement actions ever and have imposed record level fines accompanied by an unprecedented variety of additional criminal and civil sanctions.' Aaron G. Murphy, The Migratory Patterns of Business in the Global Village, 2 N.Y.U. J. L. & Bus. 229, 256 (2005).
The recent settlement of parallel FCPA actions in the Southern District of Texas against Baker Hughes, Inc., a major oilfield service company, and its wholly owned subsidiary Baker Hughes Services International Inc. (collectively 'Baker Hughes'), underscores the importance of complying with the FCPA's provisions in emerging markets. Over $4 million in bribes was paid to a consulting firm that was Baker Hughes' agent for a major oil field services contract. Baker Hughes knew that its agent would transfer funds to an official with the state-owned oil company of Kazakhstan, a country with enormous oil reserves. To resolve the actions, Baker Hughes paid $44 million in combined fines and penalties ' the largest sanction ever imposed in an FCPA case.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.