Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The court applied the forum non conveniens doctrine set forth in Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501 (1947), which was adopted in New Jersey in Gore v. U.S. Steel Corp., 15 N.J. 301 (1954). First, the court found that the UK was an adequate alternative forum for these plaintiffs, rejecting plaintiffs' argument that their inability to recover identical damages in the UK, including punitive damages, and other factors, made the UK an inadequate alternative forum. Second, balancing the parties' 'private interest' factors, the court found them to be 'geographically divided,' and not dispositive of Merck's burden of showing that the New Jersey forum is 'demonstrably inappropriate.'
Finally, the court held that the 'public interest' factors were decisive. It was likely that UK law would apply to issues relating to product approval and labeling, which occurred in the UK. Further, the UK forum had a 'distinctive' interest in adjudicating a case involving a prescription drug that was subject to UK regulatory approval, and was sold and ingested in the UK. The UK also had a strong interest in addressing the injuries of its citizens that occurred within its borders. While New Jersey has an interest in regulating the conduct of New Jersey-domiciled corporations, the court held that New Jersey's interest would be 'well-satisfied' through litigation of the 15,000 Vioxx suits filed by U.S. residents that were pending in New Jersey.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.