Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Every first-year law student who takes a torts class learns about the crucial element of causation. It is 'black letter law' that an injured party must link, in some fashion, a manufacturer's allegedly defective or negligently made product to the harm alleged in order to recover damages.
Unfortunately for many defendants, ever-more complex lawsuits and tenuous theories of liability have threatened to bury this basic principle. Some courts have gone so far as to eliminate the causation link between a particular product and the harm alleged. See, e.g., K. Cailteux and B. Gibson, 'Designer Liability: A Trap for the Unsuspecting Manufacturer or Former Manufacturer,' Product Liability Law & Strategy (August 2007) (describing instances of liability for injuries not caused by a manufacturer's product).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.