Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Crawford Violation Not Harmless in Securities Fraud Where Intent Is Paramount
In United States v. Becker, 06-1274-cr, 2007 WL 2669604, (2d Cir. Sept. 13, 2007), consistent with its holding in United States v. McClain, 377 F.3d 219, 221-22 (2d Cir. 2004), the Second Circuit held that admission of co-conspirator plea allocutions without the opportunity for cross examination violates a defendant's Sixth Amendment confrontation right under the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). However, Becker is noteworthy because of the highlighted role that the willful requirement of securities fraud played in the court's harmless error standard analysis, and its ultimate decision to affirm the lower court's judgment vacating the conviction. The court's reasoning is also instructive in arguing the willful-intent element of securities fraud, and is an artful lesson in distinguishing securities fraud actions from general criminal precedent.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.