Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Licenses
The Ninth Circuit has ruled that the proceeds from the cancellation and subsequent sale of licenses held by a licensee in bankruptcy by the Federal Communications Commission were not part of the bankruptcy estate. Thacker v. Federal Communications Commission (In re Magnacom Wireless LLC), No. 05-35839 (Sept. 17).
The debtor purchased radio spectrum licenses from the FCC to provide personal communications services. Under an installment payment plan, the debtor paid down approximately $7 million and the balance of the $55 million purchase price was to be paid in quarterly installments throughout the 10-year license. The debtor further agreed that it possessed no underlying right to the spectrum; that the licenses would be automatically cancelled in the event of default; and that it would not be entitled to any proceeds from the sale of new licenses following cancellation. The debtor ultimately did default and filed for bankruptcy. After relief was granted, the FCC cancelled the licenses and filed a proof of claim as an unsecured creditor for $48 million. While the claim was pending, the FCC auctioned the licenses and the winning bid was for $287 million. The bankruptcy court ruled the FCC was not entitled to any distribution from the estate. Additionally, in response to a complaint filed by the Chapter 7 trustee seeking the return of any proceeds from the sale of the new licenses that exceeded the amount the debtor owed the FCC, the bankruptcy court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The trustee appealed to the district court, which affirmed the decision.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?