Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Media & Communications Corner
Founded in 1792, the same year that George Washington was reelected president, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP is one of the oldest law firms in the United States. The firm's presence in New York, London, Charlotte, Washington, DC, and Beijing provides strategic advantages in these major financial and governmental centers. Directing the firm's worldwide marketing and communications effort is Claudia M. Freeman, a former practicing corporate and banking attorney with 12 years of legal marketing experience. Her law-firm background helps her understand Cadwalader's complex financial practice, enabling her to understand the key issues that affect clients and to work with the attorneys to communicate their capabilities more effectively.
The Marketing Department consists of 21 professionals dedicated to marketing and communications: the majority are based in New York, three are based in the UK and administrative personnel provide additional assistance in Washington, DC, Charlotte, NC, and Beijing. Freeman explains that the New York- and London-based Media Relations Coordinators are responsible for managing relationships with writers, reporters, editors, and producers, responding to press inquiries, working with the firm's outside public relations agency, drafting press releases, monitoring news hits, preparing press reports, managing the firm's by-lined articles program, and otherwise coordinating any media efforts. Freeman herself works very closely with the Coordinators, as well as with outside agencies, in developing messaging and strategy.
How It Works
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.