Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The future of DNA evidence in civil cases is now upon us. DNA evidence is the most powerful forensic tool available to litigants today. During this decade and beyond, gene expression data developed in connection with the mapping of the human genome will provide causation proof in toxic tort cases and workers' compensation claims that epidemiology studies cannot match. Corporations and their insurance carriers are beginning to reap the financial benefits of toxicogenomic science, which tells them at an early stage whether a toxic exposure has caused an injury to a claimant.
Most, if not all, potential jurors are aware of the use of DNA evidence in criminal cases. The television series 'CSI' and the mass-media 'CSI Effect' have created a desire, in fact a need, among jurors to see DNA proof of certain crimes such as rape or murder. Jurors want to hear about the crime scene investigators with high-tech equipment, cameras, rubber gloves and DNA swabs gathering DNA evidence such as blood, semen and saliva samples. Because jurors are becoming ever more comfortable and familiar with scientific evidence in court, DNA proof has become the smoking gun for a prosecutor to obtain a conviction. On the other hand, the lack of DNA evidence can be used by criminal defendants to raise reasonable doubt for acquittal. For instance, the lack of a DNA match was a key factor in showing the exoneration of the three accused Duke University lacrosse players, and DNA evidence has been used for several years to prove the innocence of death row inmates.
DNA Evidence in Litigation
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?