Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution provides that the 'Laws of the United States … shall be the supreme Law of the Land.' U.S. Const. Art. VI, cl. 2. Therefore, 'any state law that conflicts with federal law is 'without effect.” Cipollone v. Ligget Group Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (citation omitted). The Medical Device Amendments (MDA) to the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act contain an express preemption provision, namely 21 U.S.C. ' 360k(a), which prohibits states from imposing requirements different from, or in addition to, the specific federal requirements imposed on medical devices by FDA regulations. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has held, in a case involving ' 360k(a), that traditional state law claims are permissible and are not preempted if the common law duties involved parallel the duties statutorily imposed in the federal law and do not impose higher standards. Medtronic v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996).
Statprobe argued that plaintiffs' fraud allegation amounted to a claim of fraud-on-the-FDA, cast as a state law claim, and that any such claim was impliedly preempted by federal law in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Buckman Company v. Plaintiffs' Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001). In Buckman, plaintiff users of a medical device sued a consulting company whose role in the device's regulatory progress to market was much like Statprobe's in the present case. Plaintiffs there alleged that the consulting company made fraudulent representations to the FDA in the course of obtaining approval of the device and that but for those misrepresentations the injuries they suffered would not have occurred. The Supreme Court held that the Buckman plaintiffs' claims conflicted with, and were therefore impliedly preempted by, federal law because the subject matter of the alleged fraudulent statements made by the consulting company to the FDA were dictated by federal law provisions. In this context, the Buckman Court found that 'the relationship between a federal agency and the entity it regulates is inherently federal in character because the relationship originates from, is governed by, and terminates according to federal law.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.