Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The New Federal Lobbying Regulations

By Thor Hearne and Amy Blunt
December 21, 2007

Businesses of all sizes must participate in the political process. Failure to do so places a company's survival at risk. As President Ronald Reagan once said, 'Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.' Organizations should have a voice in whether and how they are taxed or regulated or whether you or your competitors are subsidized.

Federal and state legislation (even local government regulation) can dramatically affect the profitability of any business. And public officials need input from their constituents in the business community to understand how proposed laws will affect the businesses (and their employees) that are subject to the laws written by politicians. However, participating in the political process is not without hazard. Seeking to exert influence in the political process improperly will not only frustrate the objective, but could also result in the involvement of another federal agency ' the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Recall Rep. William Jefferson of Louisiana ' caught by the FBI with $90,000 in 'cold hard cash' in his freezer, and lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who is now wearing, instead of his trademark fedora, an orange jumpsuit.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.