Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the Supreme Court held that four factors should be used by courts to see if an expert's proposed opinions were reliable: 1) if the theory can be and has been tested; 2) if it has been subject to peer review or publication; 3) whether the known or the potential rate of error is acceptable; and 4) if the opinion has received general acceptance by the scientific community.
On remand, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 43 F.3d 1311 (1995) (Daubert II), the Ninth Circuit commented that 'one very significant fact' is whether an expert is proposing to testify about matters growing naturally and directly out of research he has conducted independent of the litigation or whether the opinion was developed expressly for the purposes of testifying. The Ninth Circuit believed that research 'conducted independent of the litigation provides important objective proof that the research comports with the dictates of good science' and findings that flow from it are less likely to have been biased toward a particular conclusion by the promise of remuneration.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.