Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Law firms are required to treat advances to and costs paid on behalf of clients as loans for tax reporting purposes. Because most law firms are cash-basis taxpayers, this practice could represent a significant outlay of cash by a law firm in a given year without being eligible for a corresponding tax deduction. How can your law firm manage its cash requirements for advancing client costs, while maintaining compliance with the tax law requirement that these advances be treated as loans? Through planning, revised fee engagement letters, and close monitoring, your firm can minimize its cash requirements for client costs and reduce its exposure for bad debt.
As determined by various court cases, expenses paid on behalf of a client that will be billed to the client are not ordinary costs of a law firm to operate its business, but rather are considered advances or loans to the client, for which repayment is expected. In other words, these payments are not allowed to be deducted as expenses for tax purposes when paid. The only time these costs can be deducted as expenses is when they are deemed uncollectible. Then they can be deducted as bad debt for tax reporting purposes. Generally, law firms pay taxes on a cash-basis method of accounting. As cash-basis taxpayers, law firms generally deduct expenses when cash is disbursed, and record revenue when cash is received. There are various exceptions to this rule. An exception that will be discussed in this article occurs when a law firm pays expenses on behalf of its client. Sometimes attorneys even pay living expenses of clients while a court case is pending. It's no wonder why, then, at the inception of many law firms, expenses paid for client costs are treated as deductions when paid and then treated as income when recovered. But this practice is incorrect; the correct accounting method is to treat them as loans when paid by the firm and as repayments of loans when reimbursed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.