Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

2007 ABA Tech Report: Editor's Note

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
January 28, 2008

This month, LJN's Legal Tech Newsletter is proud to include its third annual special supplement highlighting and analyzing information from the 2007 American Bar Association Legal Technology Survey Report. The article is written by Stephen Stine, a Research Specialist for the American Bar Association's Legal Technology Resource Center. This supplement offers an insider's unique perspective into how law firms are: taking advantage of mobile technologies and wireless connections on PDAs/smartphones to browse the Web and use real-time e-mail; streamlining their document processes; making and receiving electronic discovery requests; taking advantage of Internet offerings, including 'Web 2.0' technologies; and creating and utilizing blogs.

The ABA survey includes the responses of more than 1,850 ABA members in private practice in the U.S. and offers a comprehensive look at how the legal profession uses technology. It covers issues including technology training, budgeting and hardware and software purchases, as well as where and how lawyers use technology. The survey is broken into five volumes, focusing individually on law office computing, litigation and courtroom technology, Web-based communications, online research and mobile technology. We believe it is the most comprehensive and useful tool of its kind available and hope that you find this analysis enlightening and informative.

' Adam Schlagman, Esq., Editor-in-Chief

This month, LJN's Legal Tech Newsletter is proud to include its third annual special supplement highlighting and analyzing information from the 2007 American Bar Association Legal Technology Survey Report. The article is written by Stephen Stine, a Research Specialist for the American Bar Association's Legal Technology Resource Center. This supplement offers an insider's unique perspective into how law firms are: taking advantage of mobile technologies and wireless connections on PDAs/smartphones to browse the Web and use real-time e-mail; streamlining their document processes; making and receiving electronic discovery requests; taking advantage of Internet offerings, including 'Web 2.0' technologies; and creating and utilizing blogs.

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?