Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

KickerFeaturesTopicsTechnology Media and TelecomSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Getting Smart About Analyzing Electronically Stored Information

By Eric Rosenberg
January 28, 2008
Not long ago, the pain of analyzing electronically stored information (ESI) for legal e-discovery, regulatory inquiries, and corporate investigations was hardly a blip on the radar screen. The requests were far and few between and, significantly more time was spent chasing down memos tucked away in filing cabinets than worrying about a handful of innocuous electronic documents. e-Discovery was in its infancy, and the costly and labor intensive process of sifting through and analyzing documents simply wasn't worth re-thinking given the low volume of cases and data that needed to be reviewed.

Fast forward to 2007, where e-discovery and its concomitant analysis has become a major component of any discovery request. According to an online article from Law.com, more than 90% of new business records are created electronically, and 40% of them are never converted to paper. In fact, in its End-User Survey & Market Forecast 2006-2010, research firm Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) found that 42% of respondents state that their organization has been involved in a legal proceeding or regulatory inquiry that necessitated the search for and retrieval of electronic records. e-Mail, in particular, has become a key issue as it's used in nearly every business transaction: negotiating contract terms, settling disputes, acknowledging agreements and finalizing documents.

Further, the problem is only getting worse. Consider the newly amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), which went into effect last December. Rules 16 and 26 were amended to provide the court with early notice of e-discovery issues. A clear implication of this rule change is that the number of cases and the amount of data subject to analysis and review has increased significantly. According to a 2006 survey by international law firm Fullbright and Jaworski, large U.S. companies are already concurrently managing 556 cases on average, with an average of 50 new disputes emerging each year.

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.