Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Verdicts
Part-Time Doctor Insured Only for One Day, Not Two
The trial court erred in finding ambiguity in an insurance contract and construing the policy language in favor of the insured part-time doctor, because the policy unambiguously covered the insured for the requested date, April 10, 2000, and for the first minute on April 11, 2000. First Professionals Insurance Co. Inc. v. McKinney, '- So.2d ”, 2007 WL 4372744 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 12/17/07).
Dr. Barbara McKinney worked as a part-time pathologist. On several occasions, Dr. McKinney performed medical services for Drs. Kim and Esfahani, who were insured by First Professionals Insurance Company Inc. (FPIC). Sometimes when she substituted for these doctors, Dr. McKinney obtain her own professional liability insurance policy directly from FPIC for the particular dates on which she was going to work. This she did for the date of April 10, 2000, with her policy stating it 'begins 04/10/2000 and ends on 04/11/2000.' When she was sued for alleged medical malpractice that occurred on April 11, 2000, FPIC determined that it was not required to defend the suit. Dr. McKinney brought this suit for breach of contract and won a judgment against the insurer.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?