Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Think It's Found Money? Better Do It Right When Raising Investment Capital

By Adam J. August

When a business needs to raise money it may consider hiring a 'finder,' which is normally a consultant who helps the company find investors in the business. The company should proceed with caution in retaining a finder due to the regulated nature of its business, and there are several 'market' terms in a written Finder's Fee Agreement that the company should insist upon.

Generally, a 'finder' or 'placement agent' receives a 'finder's fee' depending upon the amount of capital it introduces to the company. The Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC') has long regulated this practice and, depending upon a facts and circumstances test (known as the 'Issuer Exemption'), requires finders to be registered as broker-dealers under '15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The factors the SEC considers for a finder to fall under the Issuer Exemption include:

  • Whether the finder is an employee or independent contractor of the company;
  • Will the finder's compensation be linked to the amount of securities sold or is it a fixed compensation;
  • Does the finder devote a substantial portion of his or her time to rendering services for the company that are not related to the sale of securities;
  • Does the finder intend to remain with the company after completion of the offering; and
  • In the past, has the finder participated, or will the finder in the future participate, in other offerings by this or other companies?

The rationale for exempting finders from registration is that the finder is not a broker because he or she is not 'effecting' transactions for others. That is, the finder's activities are limited to identifying potential investors and introducing them to the company. The negotiation of the investment terms, the theory goes, is strictly between the company and the investor.

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

When Is a Repair Structural or Nonstructural Under a Commercial Lease? Image

A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."