Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The field of forensic psychology as applied to Family and Supreme Court matters involving custody and access issues has evolved in its complexity and breadth over the last three decades to encompass a broader range of professional activities. The forensic psychology literature has begun to provide more specific guidance regarding the 'do's and don't's' of both expert witness work and trial consultancy.
Role Definitions
The expert witness role involves the evaluation of litigants, the review of a prior experts' work product/methodology, the review of clinical records, or the summarization of a particular area of psychological research with the explicit understanding that the forensic expert will be possibly asked to present a psychological opinion, under oath, about specific issues in the case at hand. The trial consultant role entails employment by a litigant's (mother's, father's or child's) legal team with the explicit understanding that the forensic expert will be assisting that team in its case conceptualization, preparation, and delivery, with an understanding that there will be no expert testimony provided.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?