Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Formal Recognition of Gay and Lesbian Relationships

By Mark Johnson
February 27, 2008

Perhaps no social issue has impassioned more sustained debate among Americans in the last decade than the question of marriage rights for same-sex couples. Gay couples sought such protections for their relationships as early as 1971, Baker v. Nelson, 191 N.W.2d 185 (Minn. 1971), appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 810 (1972), but the issue did not really impinge on the public consciousness until some 20 years later. In 1993, the Hawaii Supreme Court decided in Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P.2d 44 (Haw. 1993), that denying the right of marriage to same-sex couples amounted to sex discrimination. On remand, the trial court rejected the state's attempt to show a compelling state interest and held the marriage statute unconstitutional. The Hawaii Supreme Court affirmed. Baehr v. Miike, 1996 WL 694235 (Haw. Cir. Ct. 1996), aff'd, 950 P.2d 1234 (Haw. 1997).

Although an amendment to the Hawaii constitution later superseded the Baehr holding, the Rubicon was crossed. Congress enacted the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 110 Stat. 2419 (1996), which limited federal recognition of marriage to opposite-sex couples, and further provided that no state need recognize 'a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage' by any other state. Thus began a complex patchwork of relationship recognition policies undertaken by each of the individual states and territories in the United States. The result for a family headed by a gay or lesbian couple is that the family members' legal relationships remain constantly in flux, changing according to their state of residence, the law of each state or territory to which they may travel, and whether the particular rights in question find their source in state or federal law.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment Image

On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.

Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.