Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Formal Recognition of Gay and Lesbian Relationships
Perhaps no social issue has impassioned more sustained debate among Americans in the last decade than the question of marriage rights for same-sex couples. Gay couples sought such protections for their relationships as early as 1971, Baker v. Nelson, 191 N.W.2d 185 (Minn. 1971), appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 810 (1972), but the issue did not really impinge on the public consciousness until some 20 years later. In 1993, the Hawaii Supreme Court decided in Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P.2d 44 (Haw. 1993), that denying the right of marriage to same-sex couples amounted to sex discrimination. On remand, the trial court rejected the state's attempt to show a compelling state interest and held the marriage statute unconstitutional. The Hawaii Supreme Court affirmed. Baehr v. Miike, 1996 WL 694235 (Haw. Cir. Ct. 1996), aff'd, 950 P.2d 1234 (Haw. 1997).
Although an amendment to the Hawaii constitution later superseded the Baehr holding, the Rubicon was crossed. Congress enacted the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 110 Stat. 2419 (1996), which limited federal recognition of marriage to opposite-sex couples, and further provided that no state need recognize 'a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage' by any other state. Thus began a complex patchwork of relationship recognition policies undertaken by each of the individual states and territories in the United States. The result for a family headed by a gay or lesbian couple is that the family members' legal relationships remain constantly in flux, changing according to their state of residence, the law of each state or territory to which they may travel, and whether the particular rights in question find their source in state or federal law.
According to the Human Rights Campaign (www.hrc.org), 26 states have adopted constitutional provisions limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples. Nineteen states have enacted similar statutory restrictions. Meanwhile, ten states and the District of Columbia have adopted varying levels of legal protection for same-sex couples and their children. While only one American jurisdiction allows same-sex couples to marry, at least five countries worldwide, including Canada, do so.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?