Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Infringement/Rule 12(b)(6) Motion
Though rarely granted by courts in copyright-infringement cases, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California approved a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a copyright-infringement claim alleging that the syndicated talk show 'Rachael Ray' was substantially similar to a treatment and brief script titled 'Showbiz Chefs' that the plaintiffs submitted to the Food Network. Zella v. The E.W. Scripps Co., CV 06-7055 ABC(JTLX). The district court considered only the complaint itself and DVDs of 'Rachael Ray' episodes. The court also took judicial notice that hosts, celebrity guests, interviews and cooking segments are common TV-show elements. Then applying the extrinsic test, which examines concrete 'articulable similarities,' the court determined that the works in dispute were dissimilar in characters, dialogue, moods, pace, plots, sequences, settings and themes. The court noted that the plaintiffs 'have attached to their Complaint the one-page synopsis and three-page script for Showbiz Chefs, so the Court may consider it on a motion to dismiss. The Court may also consider the Rachael Ray show, as its content comprises the basis for Plaintiffs' claim and the CBS Defendants have, provided copies of episodes. The Court holds that no reasonable jury could conclude that Rachael Ray is substantially similar to any protectable elements of Showbiz Chefs or to the order in which Plaintiffs have presented non-protectable elements in Showbiz Chefs.'
Record Labels and Their Lawyers/Malicious Prosecution
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.