Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

FTC Staff Proposal Raises the Bar for Behavioral Advertising

By D. Reed Freeman, Jr.
On Dec. 20, the Federal Trade Commission ('FTC') staff released for public comment proposed online behavioral-advertising privacy principles ('Principles') in an effort to guide self-regulation of this nascent industry (see, FTC, Press Release, 'FTC Staff Proposes Online Behavioral Advertising Privacy Principles,' at www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/12/principles.shtm).

The release of these Principles followed a two-day Town Hall meeting the FTC held late last year on behavioral advertising, which itself followed the FTC's Tech-Ade Workshop in 2006. The FTC staff's Principles include specific recommendations and questions for industry regarding:

  • Transparency and consumer control (including notice and choice);
  • Data security;
  • Data retention;
  • Changes to privacy policies (including a proposed opt-in for the retroactive application of material changes to privacy policies); and
  • Questions regarding how sensitive data should be treated.

Comments on the proposed Principles were initially due by Feb. 22, but the deadline was extended to April 11. Comments are likely to range from the very specific ' some trade associations may propose entirely new or modified self-regulatory principles for their members ' to the general, with other trade associations and coalitions offering arguments, and perhaps even econometric and other statistical evidence supporting arguments opposed to the staff's proposals.

While the FTC document recognizes that behavioral advertising provides a number of benefits to consumers, it is important to understand that the staff's proposed Principles are based on the premises that:

  • Consumers are unaware of behavioral-advertising practices or cannot discern when such practices are used;
  • Transparency and consumer autonomy are critical to consumer trust and to the online marketplace; and
  • Data collected for behavioral advertising may fall into the wrong hands or be used for unanticipated purposes.

Broad Definition of Behavioral Advertising

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.