Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Another year has come and gone, and Congress has again failed to enact comprehensive data-breach legislation.
To be sure, numerous bills have been proposed and considered, but none has gained the momentum necessary to make it to the President's desk. Certainly, many reasons why such legislation is needed exist and are acknowledged, but one of the primary benefits would be the establishment of national standards that would preempt the current myriad state data-protection laws.
In fact, it seems that Congress' failure to act has spurred state legislatures and local jurisdictions to jump into the gap as a bridge. At least 39 states have legislated data-breach notification requirements for entities conducting business in their jurisdictions. But now, states are going further, and legislating or regulating at the very cutting edge of data privacy ' proposing or passing laws requiring specific security measures, and incorporating the payment-card industry's data-security standards ('PCI DSS') into their bills.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?