Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Many law firms have joined the quest to go 'paperless.' This holy grail of efficiency and order in the digital age has been touted for years as being just over the horizon. The answer to the question 'how do we get there?' has been just as elusive. Sure, some of your colleagues may have achieved this ideal within the confines of their personal office, but frequently at the expense of significant additional burden and paper for those who support or collaborate with them. In a world where so many attorneys and support staff still rely on hard copy versions of documents, the only way to quickly go paperless has involved massive amounts of document imaging, even when many of the documents being scanned originated in an electronic format.
What is the attraction of a 'paperless office'? This phrase conjures images of a pristine working environment, free of clutter, where any piece of information is available at a moment's notice. There is no doubt that electronic information offers the promise of easy searching and reuse coupled with a very slim physical footprint. Paper, on the other hand, turns very quickly into a disorganized mess and tends to clutter our sight for years because this hardcopy information sits in piles on desks and floors or in boxes in basements and warehouses.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.