Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Illinois ABA Franchise Committee Launched
On March 12, the Illinois State Bar Standing Committee on Franchising and Distribution law held its inaugural meeting, joining the ranks of state bars in other franchise registration states that have dedicated franchise committees.
Credit for launching the committee goes to Joseph Sheyka (DLA Piper, Chicago) and John R.F. Baer (Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, Chicago). The committee anticipates sharing ideas with Illinois franchise regulators while the regulators consider modifications to the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act in time for the new federal Franchise Rule to become effective on July 1, 2008.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?