Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Drug & Device News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
March 28, 2008

Study Says Antidepressants Generally Do Not Work

A paper published in February in the journal Plos Medicine asserts that most patients receive no measurable benefit from taking prescribed antidepressant medications. The paper ' Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the FDA ' was authored by professors at England's University of Hull, who analized data from several antidepressants' clinical trails, including those that went unpublished. They found that only a small number of severely depressed patients were helped by antidepressants and that those with lesser degrees of depression (and even some who were extremely depressed) exhibited no clinically significant benefits with antidepressant use as compared to placebo use. The research team chalked up the drug companies' claims of widespread patient benefits with antidepressant use to reporting biases caused by multiple publication of test results and selective reporting of only favorable results.

In a University of Hull release, Professor Irving Kirsch of the university's psychology department, and the study's lead researcher, said, 'The difference in improvement between patients taking placebos and patients taking antidepressants is not very great. This means that depressed people can improve without chemical treatments. Given these results, there seems little reason to prescribe antidepressant medication to any but the most severely depressed patients, unless alternative treatments have failed to provide a benefit. This study raises serious issues that need to be addressed surrounding drug licensing and how drug trial data is reported.' University of Hull release, 'Antidepressants are ineffective for most patients, study finds,' http://www.hull.ac.uk/news/feb08/antidepressants.html (last accessed 2/26/08).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?