Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
ABC Bank is a publicly traded lender specializing in consumer loans to first-time homebuyers in the southeastern United States. For the past three years, ABC Bank has posted record revenues from its operations in central Florida's hot real estate market. In 2005, ABC Bank decided to focus its efforts on new-loan origination. The bank's strategy was to originate consumer real-estate mortgages, quickly package them together and sell them on the financial markets. ABC Bank then used the proceeds to originate new loans. Most of the bank's employees spent their time originating new mortgages. Most other administrative functions, including appraisals, were handled by outside vendors.
Larry Lender heads ABC Bank's loan department in Midcity, FL. Larry has lived in Midcity all of his life and knows the real-estate market well. In 2006, Larry began noticing loans coming through for his approval based on appraisals that he suspected, even in the context of a hot real-estate market, were unrealistically high. Larry also knew, however, that ABC Bank would hold these mortgages only for a few weeks before packaging them into mortgage-backed securities ('MBSs') and selling them on the financial markets through an investment bank. The investment bank often repackaged some of the MBS into collateralized debt obligations ('CDOs'), which are debt securities backed by portfolios of other debt securities. Larry therefore viewed the risks to ABC Bank as minimal and approved the loans. He had many discussions with the bank's loan department heads in other cities in Florida, and understood that they were doing the same thing, as was most of ABC Bank's competition. Larry received a bonus at the end of the year based largely upon his loan volume. Since 2006, Larry's annual bonuses have dwarfed his salary.
In 2008, Midcity's real-estate market began declining steeply, and Larry learned that an unexpectedly large percentage of the loans he had originated were in default. He also learned from his supervisors that ABC Bank was having trouble raising new funds to lend because it could no longer turn its existing mortgages into MBSs and sell them on the financial markets. Shortly thereafter, ABC Bank received a broad SEC subpoena and, subsequently, a grand jury subpoena concerning its lending practices.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?