Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An attorney's receipt of apparently privileged materials during litigation presents a conundrum. Was the disclosure purposeful or inadvertent? May the lawyer assume the privilege was waived? What are the recipient lawyer's duties? How should the lawyer respond? Should the lawyer receiving the seemingly privileged documents notify opposing counsel? How extensively should the lawyer analyze the documents before notifying opposing counsel? Does the content of the document matter? May the lawyer receiving the privileged information provide it to his client or expert to analyze?
Many of these questions were posed in the article, 'Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged Material Presents Complex Ethical Issues for the Recipient,' published in the July 2005 edition of Product Liability Law & Strategy, which highlighted the California Supreme Court's opportunity in Rico v. Mitsubishi Motors to establish the ethical duties of lawyers who receive privileged documents mistakenly.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.