Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Economists rarely agree on anything. But, if the Fed's recent actions are any guide, most believe the U.S. is already in a recession (defined as two consecutive quarters of negative growth). This downward economic outlook for the country will soon begin impacting corporate budget discussions, forcing every department ' including legal and the law firms that serve them ' to re-examine their expenses. When companies are struggling to grow the top line, every cost gets scrutinized. Legal expenses are no exception, especially given the sharp increase in spending and dollars going towards e-discovery.
According to Gartner, the market for e-discovery products and services is growing by more than 37% per year. Similarly, IDC's recent forecast for the legal discovery market predicts spending will reach a staggering $21.8 billion by 2011.
The downward economic outlook combined with spiraling e-discovery costs has prompted more General Counsels ('GCs') to begin partnering with Chief Information Officers ('CIOs') to figure out a solution. Together, the two departments are developing strategies to tackle rapidly growing e-discovery expenses. Collaboration is critical. Just as sales executives partnered with CIOs to implement Customer Relationship Management ('CRM') systems in the 1990s, the same alliance is beginning to take place between legal executives and CIOs. By leveraging each team's area of expertise, organizations can make the smartest decisions possible about investing in new technologies to streamline the critical e-discovery business process, reducing costs and risks.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.