Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceLJN NewslettersNewsSections

<b>Practice Notes:</b> Judge Denies Fees to Lawyers in Hip-Hop Bankruptcy

By Anthony Lin
May 28, 2008
A bankruptcy judge slammed a New York law firm for putting its own desire to be paid above the interests of its hip-hop publishing client in a Chapter 11 proceeding. In a stinging 38-page decision, Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez denied Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf any compensation for its work on the bankruptcy of hip-hop media company Source Enterprises Inc. In re Source Enterprises Inc., 06-11707.

The New York firm had sought around $526,000 in fees for the five months from September 2006 to February 2007 that it acted as debtor's counsel to Source, publisher of The Source magazine. But Gonzalez said the 'manner in which Windels represented the Debtor and the firm's eventual singular concentration on fees, as opposed to its role as counsel, caused harm to the Debtor sufficient to support a denial of all fees sought.'

The judge said Windels Marx had a conflict of interest in representing Source in its bankruptcy proceeding because the law firm was itself a creditor and had a bill outstanding with the debtor company of as much as $200,000, even before the bankruptcy filing. Windels Marx partner Charles E. Simpson, who led the firm's bankruptcy representation, testified that his firm 'waived' that amount, but Gonzalez gave this claim little credence, noting that the firm did not write off the time until it was challenged on it in November 2007, and that even the firm's client was unaware the bill had been forgiven. Moreover, the judge pointed out, Windels Marx later sought payment of some of the supposedly waived legal fees from Source affiliates. Simpson did not return a call seeking comment.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment Image

On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.