Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Burn Not a Complication of Surgery
A New York court granted partial summary judgment to a medical malpractice plaintiff who showed that a burn she received from a surgical instrument's careless placement on her abdomen during surgery was not a 'complication of surgery.' Sweeney v. Budnik, 19 Misc.3d 1113(A), Slip Copy, 2008 WL 880203 (Table) (Sup. Ct., Dutchess Cty. 4/2/08).
The plaintiff patient moved for partial summary judgment on liability against the defendant doctor in this medical malpractice suit. She claimed she suffered a burn that left a permanent scar on her abdomen, an injury that was not a risk associated with her laparoscopic gallbladder surgery. The doctor admitted causing the injury, but argued it was due to a complication of surgery, and not because she deviated from accepted medical standards. The plaintiff's expert concluded the injury was caused by the doctor's carelessness in leaving electrified scissors with the wire still attached on the plaintiff's stomach. The expert said that this action was a deviation from accepted medical practices, not a complication of surgery. The court agreed, finding the plaintiff established her prima facie entitlement to summary judgment against the defendant, who admitted misusing surgical equipment, and thus had departed from accepted medical procedures and caused the plaintiff's injury. Therefore, the motion for partial summary judgment was granted.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.