Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Employers' Right to Limit Employees' E-Mail Upheld

By Matthew Damon
June 26, 2008

Since the introduction of electronic communications into the workplace, employers of both union and non-union workforces have sought to establish guidelines for employee use of company communications systems. This interest in establishing lawful limits on employee use has grown as the variety of available electronic communications has proliferated beyond e-mail to include Internet usage, blogs, podcasts, social networks and discussion boards. Many employers maintain policies governing employee use of those resources as well as voicemail, telephones, teleconferencing and other communications systems. These policies arise from concerns involving not only system security, but prevention of sexual harassment, eliminating non-productive use of work time and equipment, protection of confidential information and minimizing potential liability to third parties. Many employers have also been concerned about employee use of company-owned communications systems to engage in union organizing or advocacy, and have consequently sought to limit the use of company-owned resources like e-mail systems for those purposes.

In the cases considered by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), its General Counsel or Administrative Law Judges, the Board had treated employer restrictions on employee e-mail usage much as it treats employer limits on workplace distribution of union literature and solicitation of co-workers. These rules are familiar to most employers: prohibition of 'distribution,' i.e., dissemination of written materials, is permitted unless the employee is in a non-work area and on non-work time, while 'solicitation,' defined as purely oral encouragement, may be prohibited only during work time. The rationale for this distinction is that work areas, at least in the traditional workplace, might become cluttered or disrupted by distribution of literature, so employers have a greater interest in limiting that sort of communication.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Supreme Court Rules Rejection of Trademark License Does Not Rescind Rights of Licensee Image

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."