Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Supreme Court Sides with Defendants in Federal Money-Laundering Cases
The Supreme Court recently issued two opinions interpreting federal money-laundering statutes in favor of the criminal defendants. Justice Thomas, writing for a unanimous Court in Cuellar v. United States, No. 06-1456, slip op. (U.S. June 2, 2008), available at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ opinions/07pdf/06-1456.pdf, held that the government must show that a defendant did more than just conceal money during transport to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C. ' 1956(a)(2)(B)(i), which prohibits international transportation of proceeds from unlawful activity. The petitioner was charged with attempting to transport the proceeds of unlawful activity across the border, knowing that the transportation was designed 'to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control' of the money. 18 U.S.C. ' 1956(a)(2)(B)(i).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.