Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Drug & Device News
New Jersey and Texas Courts Reduce Vioxx Awards
On May 29, appellate courts in New Jersey and Texas threw out or reduced multi-million dollar awards to plaintiffs who claimed they were injured by Merck & Co.'s painkiller Vioxx. A three-judge panel of New Jersey's Appellate Division held in the consolidated cases of McDarby v. Merck & Co., A-0076-07, and Cona v. Merck & Co., 0077-07, that a $15.7 million award to plaintiff John McDarby should be reduced to $4.5 million because the federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act (FDCA) pre-empted New Jersey's product liability act's punitive damages remedy, N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-5c. (Cona had won no damages.) The appellate court left McDarby's reduced award for compensatory damages in place, however, because it found that state tort-law remedies were not pre-empted by federal law. In the Texas case, Carol Ernst v. Merck & Co. Inc., the three-justice appellate panel reversed the $26.1 million judgment for Carol Ernst, whose 59-year-old husband died in 2001 after taking Vioxx for about nine months. Stated the court, 'We find no evidence that [Ernst's husband] suffered a thrombotic cardiovascular event, i.e., a myocardial infraction triggered by a blood clot. Accordingly, appellee failed to show that the ingestion of Vioxx caused her husband's death.' Ernst's attorney, W. Mark Lanier of Houston, said following the decision, 'I'm upset, and I'll appeal it.'
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.