Unauthorized Source Code Copying
Conversion Claim Not Cognizable in PA
Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
e-Commerce Docket Sheet
A conversion claim against a software licensee based on allegations of unauthorized copying of the licensed source code is not cognizable because neither copyrights nor the software at issue are subject to conversion under Pennsylvania law. Apparel Business Systems, LLC v. Tom James Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26313 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2008). The court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant on the conversion and copyright claims, concluding that the plaintiff lacked standing because it failed to establish that it owns the software copyrights at issue or make a cognizable conversion claim under state law. The court found that copyrights are not the kind of intangible rights that customarily merge in a particular document because the rights associated with copyright ownership are not embodied in the physical paper of the copyright registration, but arise as soon as the work is fixed in a tangible medium. The court also held that software is not the type of property subject to a conversion claim, because it was doubtful that the copied code amounted to chattel or deprived the plaintiff of the use of its software, as it was not the case that 'the defendants carried off a disk containing the plaintiff's program and refused to give it back.'
Read These Next
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.