Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Foreign F.O.B. Shipment of Infringing Product Does Not Defeat Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction

By Judith L. Grubner

F.o.b. or 'free on board' is a shipping method under which goods are delivered at a designated location where legal title (and thus the risk of loss) passes from the seller to the buyer. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has determined that a trial court does not lose subject matter jurisdiction over a patent or copyright infringement case where all sales of accused products to U.S. customers were made f.o.b. in Canada by a Canadian corporation. Litecubes, LLC v. Northern Light Prods., Inc., ___ F.3d ____ (Fed. Cir. 2008). Whether a defendant 'makes, uses, offers to sell or sells any patented invention, within the United States or imports into the United States any patented invention' is a factual element required to prove patent infringement, but does not affect federal subject matter jurisdiction.

Background

The inventor/owner Carl Vanderschuit and the licensee Litecubes, LLC of U.S. Patent No. 6,416,198 (the ”198 patent') sued Northern Light Products, Inc. (d/b/a GlowProducts.com), a Canadian corporation located in Victoria, British Columbia, for patent and copyright infringement. GlowProducts acquired novelty items from Chinese manufacturers and sold them directly to customers in the U.S. The '198 patent disclosed a lighted artificial ice cube known as the Litecube. Litecubes owned the registered copyright on the Litecube product. After a jury rendered a verdict of willful patent and copyright infringement, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri entered a judgment against GlowProducts.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.