Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Companies are acutely aware of their duties with respect to the safety of the products they manufacture, and most have intricate frameworks in place to ensure that their products are manufactured in a safe and consistent manner. Given the recent explosion of product safety issues tied to products manufactured in China, companies are under even more scrutiny to ensure the safety of their products. The intense media scrutiny surrounding the rash of recalls of Chinese-made products (e.g., pet food, toys, toothpaste) has only increased the pressure on companies to make their products safe for consumers. However, what do companies do when consumers are injured by counterfeits of popular, brand-name products? What duty, if any, do companies have to police the marketplace and protect consumers against dangers arising from counterfeits? These counterfeits, a number of which are manufactured in China, are generally of a much lower quality and are manufactured without appropriate QA/QC mechanisms that many large companies have in place. Outside of any legal duty ' whether in courts or regulatory directives ' what must a company do to protect its brand name? Even if companies escape legal liability arising out of injuries to consumers caused by counterfeit products, the effect on a company's reputation may be just as disastrous.
This article presents a brief overview of the current state of the law regarding manufacturers' responsibilities with respect to counterfeit products, highlights some of the policy considerations a court is likely to take into account in determining whether or not to impose some duty upon manufacturers, and then provides some practical recommendations for companies to consider going forward.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.