Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A question that arises repeatedly in professional service firms is what constitutes reasonable compensation for employee-owners. For many firms, no single operating expense category impacts the bottom-line enterprise profit as much as the compensation paid to the employee-owners of the enterprise. Clearly, an expense that is discretionary to the owner in terms of its magnitude, timing and method of payment, may represent not only compensation for services rendered, but may also be a disguised dividend or a distribution of profits. The amount of profits paid as compensation determined to be “reasonable” for tax reporting purposes can easily be manipulated by adjusting the compensation paid within the ownership group.
This article is intended to provide some fundamental guidance for attorneys and law firms whenever employee-owner compensation is at issue. In many instances, this focus will relate to ownership decisions regarding the overall allocation and character of enterprise profits, but the same concepts and analytical framework can be of benefit in the assessment of reasonable compensation for other purposes, such as the valuation of a non-compete agreement and in the segregation and measurement of personal/professional versus enterprise goodwill for dissolution of marriage purposes in jurisdictions where this aspect is in play. (See Identifying and Measuring Personal Goodwill in a Professional Practice, by Mark O. Dietrich, CPA/ABV, AICPA CPA Expert, Spring 2005.) Another emerging area where these principles are often applied is in the evaluation of excess or inadequate compensation challenges by the Internal Revenue Service, with respect to closely held C corporations or Subchapter S corporations, respectively. The issue with S corporations paying too little in wages to the owners to allow them to take a larger share of enterprise profits as distributions not subject to employment taxes has received significant recent attention from the Internal Revenue Service on behalf of the Social Security administration. This article provides guidance on what factors would be considered in determinations of reasonable compensation for this purpose.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.