Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A question that arises repeatedly in professional service firms is what constitutes reasonable compensation for employee-owners. For many firms, no single operating expense category impacts the bottom-line enterprise profit as much as the compensation paid to the employee-owners of the enterprise. Clearly, an expense that is discretionary to the owner in terms of its magnitude, timing and method of payment, may represent not only compensation for services rendered, but may also be a disguised dividend or a distribution of profits. The amount of profits paid as compensation determined to be “reasonable” for tax reporting purposes can easily be manipulated by adjusting the compensation paid within the ownership group.
This article is intended to provide some fundamental guidance for attorneys and law firms whenever employee-owner compensation is at issue. In many instances, this focus will relate to ownership decisions regarding the overall allocation and character of enterprise profits, but the same concepts and analytical framework can be of benefit in the assessment of reasonable compensation for other purposes, such as the valuation of a non-compete agreement and in the segregation and measurement of personal/professional versus enterprise goodwill for dissolution of marriage purposes in jurisdictions where this aspect is in play. (See Identifying and Measuring Personal Goodwill in a Professional Practice, by Mark O. Dietrich, CPA/ABV, AICPA CPA Expert, Spring 2005.) Another emerging area where these principles are often applied is in the evaluation of excess or inadequate compensation challenges by the Internal Revenue Service, with respect to closely held C corporations or Subchapter S corporations, respectively. The issue with S corporations paying too little in wages to the owners to allow them to take a larger share of enterprise profits as distributions not subject to employment taxes has received significant recent attention from the Internal Revenue Service on behalf of the Social Security administration. This article provides guidance on what factors would be considered in determinations of reasonable compensation for this purpose.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.